However, I’m not sure if you use a string attribute, i.e. an Unspecified String Attribute, if that string can be accessed via “edit formula” to put in a rule. Would be interesting to try. My suggestion, is to ignore the string attribute for now, and just use string parameters. They are exposed to DataSheets, and you don’t have to mess around the bugginess and hidden behavior of an attribute.

HTH

I would like to rename the main geometrical set of a Powercopy as with a UDF, since whenever I instantiate, all Instances are named the same and it gets a bit confusing…nevertheless i cannot find how to add atributes.

If you could give me a direction in how to rename pc, it would be of a great help to me.

Shape nodes are the representation of the core geometry. I.e. the Nurbs and Polygon characteristics of the geometry. Think of this as the “nurbs-ness” or the “poly-ness” of the geometry.

As for blending, it depends on how you define blending. If you are thinking of the term “Blendshape,” then no. This won’t affect the “Blendshape” per se, but it will allow the creation and manipulation of nurbs to have the same UV count, which is imperative for all “Blendshape” preparation. However, Shape Node manipulation doesn’t always guarantee a “blendshape” match. It’s best to make all geometry with the desired UV count first, then modify the geometry to the new shape–then run the blendshape utility. Or, you can rebuild, but this might modify the geometry into a slightly altered shape from the original, and it removes the Make Node properties.